BTG Newsroom
Banner for Barnes Trial Group's blood donation campaign. The Barnes Trial Group logo appears above the large headline, "Donate Blood," followed by the message, "Save Lives!" On the right side, illustrated hands hold and pass large red blood drops, one featuring a heart symbol and another featuring a heartbeat line. The design uses a dark teal background with white and light blue text to promote blood donation and community impact.

Blood Drive 11/06

Barnes Trial Group is proud to host a community blood drive on Thursday, November 5, 2026, from 10:00 AM to 3:30 PM at our office.

Every donation can help save lives, and as a thank you, each donor will receive one raffle entry to win two Tampa Bay Lightning tickets (Center Ice, Section 101) for the Lightning vs. Capitals game on November 17 at 7:30 PM.

Barnes Trial Group
1104 N Howard Ave
Tampa, FL 33607

Appointments are encouraged and help ensure a smooth experience, but walk-ins are always welcome.

If you’re able to donate, please consider scheduling your appointment in advance and inviting a friend or colleague to join you. Together, we can make a meaningful impact in our community.

We hope to see you there!

Donate Blood. Save Lives. Make a Difference.

About BTG Newsroom

BTG Newsroom publishes firm updates, media coverage, and legal commentary from the attorneys at BTG.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Have Questions About a Potential Case?

If you or a loved one were affected by circumstances similar to those discussed in this article, BTG is available to discuss your legal options.

View Related Posts

Landmark Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Case

Barnes Trial Group is proud to announce that attorney David J. Sales secured a landmark victory before the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Ricapor-Hall. The Court affirmed a $14 million verdict, including the restoration of nearly $3 million in damages, and established an important precedent regarding the application of comparative fault in cases involving intentional fraud.